Web Quality Index
zoomdrain.com

zoomdrain.com

Corporate / B2B site, served through cloudflare.

Site typeCorporate / B2B
Online sinceJanuary 2001
CDN / WAFcloudflare
Web Quality Score
53/100
Needs work
Some essentials are in place, but several key standards are failing.
Check breakdown
35 scored
A further 20 standards didn’t apply to this site — most are accessibility and privacy tests that need page contents to evaluate.
Is email from this domain trustworthy?
18
Needs work
11 standards behind this question
Fail5
Fail

Stops scammers from emailing customers as you

You have DMARC set up, but in monitor-only mode — it's not actually rejecting spoofed mail.

WEBQ-01
Fail

Lists who's allowed to email as your business

No SPF record is published, so nothing tells mail providers who's allowed to send as you.

WEBQ-03
Fail

You email from your own domain, not Gmail

Your published contact email is on a free service, not your own domain.

WEBQ-75
Fail

A contact form people can actually find

We couldn't find a visible contact form on your homepage.

WEBQ-83
Fail

A clickable email link on your site

We couldn't find a tap-to-email link anywhere on your site.

WEBQ-84

6 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Can people find this site?
48
Needs work
10 standards behind this question
Pass1Fail3
Fail

How your site appears when shared or in search results

Your homepage is missing one or more of the standard social-share and search-preview tags.

WEBQ-11
Fail

A map of your site for search engines

No sitemap.xml or robots.txt is published.

WEBQ-14
Fail

Whether your behind-the-scenes labels are valid

We didn't find any structured-data tags on your homepage.

WEBQ-39
Pass

How easy it is to reach your deepest pages

Important pages are reachable in just a click or two from your homepage.

WEBQ-43

6 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is it safe to visit?
67
Fair
21 standards behind this question
Pass6Review2Fail4
Fail

Browser-level protections for visitors

Your site isn't sending any of the standard browser-protection headers.

WEBQ-04
Fail

Visitors connect faster on the first click

Your server doesn't staple OCSP. Visitors' browsers may have to contact the CA themselves, slowing first connects.

WEBQ-91
Fail

Strict mode for your padlock check

Neither OCSP stapling nor Must-Staple is in play. A revoked cert wouldn't be caught quickly.

WEBQ-96
Fail

Your site finishes its handshake quickly

Your TLS handshake takes over a second on a cold connection. Move behind a CDN with TLS session resumption and 0-RTT.

WEBQ-98
Review

Your padlock isn't using outdated keys

Your certificate uses outdated key strength or a SHA-1 signature. Reissue with a modern ACME-class cert.

WEBQ-89
Review

Your certificate is publicly logged

Your certificate carries only one embedded SCT — modern browsers want at least two. Reissue from a CA that includes them.

WEBQ-92
Pass

Your padlock isn't about to expire

Your SSL certificate is valid and not close to expiring.

WEBQ-05
Pass

Private files aren't open to the public

None of the common admin or developer paths are publicly reachable.

WEBQ-07
Pass

Old recordings stay locked even if a key leaks

Forward secrecy is guaranteed by the negotiated handshake — past traffic stays unreadable even if your key leaks.

WEBQ-88
Pass

Your padlock loads cleanly on every device

Your server sends the full certificate chain — every device builds the path to a trusted root cleanly.

WEBQ-90
Pass

Your padlock renews on a healthy schedule

Your certificate uses a short validity window (≤ 90 days) — auto-renewal keeps revocation fast and frictionless.

WEBQ-95
Pass

Your padlock comes from a reputable vendor

Your certificate is issued by a tier-1 publicly trusted CA (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Google Trust, Sectigo, etc.).

WEBQ-97

9 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is it fast?
71
Strong
14 standards behind this question
Pass5Review1Fail3
Fail

Your site uses the newest connection style

Your server still serves over the older HTTP/2 protocol — not the newer, faster HTTP/3.

WEBQ-30
Fail

Reachable on the modern internet

Your domain has no IPv6 address — only the older IPv4.

WEBQ-31
Fail

Photos lower on the page wait their turn

Images below the fold aren't lazy-loaded — visitors download them up front even if they never scroll that far.

WEBQ-35
Review

Your photos are saved in modern formats

Your images are served as JPEG or PNG when modern formats (WebP, AVIF) would cut their size by 30–60% with no visible loss.

WEBQ-32
Pass

How fast your site loads on a phone

Your homepage loads fast on mobile — the metrics Google uses for ranking are in the green.

WEBQ-08
Pass

How fast your site loads on a laptop

Your homepage loads fast on desktop — Google's ranking signal is in the green.

WEBQ-33
Pass

How real visitors actually experience your speed

Real visitors report fast loads in Chrome User Experience data — your live performance is genuinely good.

WEBQ-34
Pass

Your text shows up while fonts load

Your fonts swap in cleanly — text is readable in the system font while custom fonts download.

WEBQ-36
Pass

Your homepage isn't bloated

Your homepage downloads at a reasonable size.

WEBQ-37

5 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Can everyone use it?
79
Strong
7 standards behind this question
Pass3Review1Fail1
Fail

Your headings are in a sensible order

Your heading levels skip — for example, an H1 followed by an H3 with no H2 in between. Screen reader users lose the outline of the page.

WEBQ-55
Review

Your site works for visitors with disabilities

Automated accessibility scans flagged issues on your homepage — alt text, contrast, ARIA labels, or heading structure problems that block real users.

WEBQ-53
Pass

Your buttons and forms are labeled for screen readers

Interactive elements have proper ARIA labels — screen reader users get a clear description of each control.

WEBQ-57
Pass

Your photos have written descriptions

Every image on your homepage has alt text — screen readers can describe them.

WEBQ-54
Pass

Text is dark enough to read

Text on your homepage meets WCAG AA contrast minimums — readable by visitors with low vision.

WEBQ-56

2 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Does this look like a real business?
—
—
Does it respect visitor privacy?
—
—
6 standards behind this question

6 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Site signals

Context we detected about this site — presence, reputation, and the tools it runs. These are informational and don't affect the score, up or down.

AI-readiness
AI crawler robots.txt directivesJan 2000
JSON-LD richness score for LLMsNot detected
Brand presence
Domain age (RDAP / WHOIS)Not detected
Wayback Machine site age & last snapshotFirst archived Jan 2001
Google Business Profile presence + ratingNot detected
Bing PlacesNot detected
Analytics tools detectedNot detected
Payment processors detectedNot detected
Marketing automation tools detectedNot detected
Customer support tools detectedNot detected
Tag manager presenceNot detected
Ad networks detectedNot detected
Email health
Email provider class (Workspace / 365 / Zoho / self-hosted / shared)Not detected
Free-email exposure on contact page (gmail/yahoo/outlook visible)Detected
Email Service Provider (ESP) detectedNot detected
Transactional email provider detected (from SPF includes)Not detected
Email forwarding service detected (improvmx, forwardemail, etc.)Not detected